Being a literary critic does not necessarily make someone a better writer.
Literary critics focus on analyzing and interpreting literature, evaluating its strengths and weaknesses, and providing insights and commentary on the works they study.
Their expertise lies in understanding and contextualizing literature.
On the other hand, being a good writer requires a separate set of skills, such as creativity, storytelling abilities, language proficiency, and the capacity to engage and captivate readers.
While some literary critics may possess strong writing skills due to their extensive engagement with literature, it is not a guarantee that they will excel as creative or professional writers.
Writing proficiency is a skill that can be developed through practice, study, and personal exploration, and it is not exclusive to literary critics.
Many successful writers come from various backgrounds and fields, and their talents may stem from different sources, including their unique perspectives, life experiences, and dedication to honing their craft.
Therefore, while literary critics may have a deep understanding and appreciation for literature, it does not automatically translate into being better writers.
Writing prowess depends on a combination of factors, including natural aptitude, practice, dedication, and personal style.
In the light of the foregoing, substitute literary critics with government critics and you’d have your answers.
Thank you.
